webhome2-e1463578931750-300x279-8083610Twenty-nine* of the 37 districts that sought to override the property tax cap were successful in yesterday’s school budget votes, as the majority of districts elected to limit their tax increases to the cap itself.

The votes, held in the 669 school districts outside of New York’s five largest cities, were to authorize a total of $36 billion in spending, backed by $21 billion in property taxes. The highest concentrations of override attempts were in Suffolk County on Long Island (8 attempts, 6 successful) and in Delaware County in the Southern Tier (5 successful attempts). The districts that successfully overrode the cap included a mix of poor rural districts as well as affluent suburbs.

In May 2015, 7 out of 18 override attempts failed.

Because of the negligible increase in the consumer price index during calendar year 2015, the allowable growth factor at the heart of the tax cap was set to the lowest level since its enactment—.12 percent.

Despite claims to the contrary, the growth factor is designed to reflect home and businessowners’ ability to pay, not the real or perceived spending needs of the school district.

A consortium led by the state’s largest teachers union, NYSUT, warned of the “devastating impact” of the low limit, but the number doesn’t tell the whole story.

As we noted on this page in January, the districts are also experiencing savings from decreased pension contributions, reducing their costs by an estimated $1 billion over two years.

Meanwhile, statewide K-12 enrollment has decreased every year since 2000-01, and the majority of districts plan to educate fewer students next year than during the current school year.

This was the fifth round of school budget votes conducted under the cap, which this year held the associated property tax levies to their lowest rate of growth in recent history, less than 1 percent. This marks a visible departure from the pre-cap period when school districts together increased taxed by 7 percent or more in four consecutive budgets (2002 to 2005). This restraint in spending growth makes the cap a continued target of NYSUT, which continues to attack the law in state court.

The balance between successful override attempts and spending restraint indicate that the cap has struck the proper balance in restraining tax increases while respecting local control.

Unfortunately, New York State missed a golden opportunity to realign its relationship with its school districts in light of this year’s lower cap.

Instead of providing substantive mandate relief that would have allowed school districts to rightsize their costs, the state Legislature responded with a sizable increase in state aid that allowed many districts to keep taxes flat while increasing their spending.

State aid for school districts is now 24 percent higher than it was in Governor Andrew Cuomo’s first budget. The most recent aid increase will be the baseline for future demands from the teachers unions and other advocacy groups for whom more is never enough.

*This post has been updated to correct the number of successful overrides.

About the Author

Ken Girardin

Ken Girardin is the Empire Center’s Director of Strategic Initiatives.

Read more by Ken Girardin

You may also like

“LIFO” strikes again

Rochester schools are laying off 152 teachers, but there’s little doubt which educators are on the chopping block. Read More

School budgets sail under cap

Yesterday’s school budget votes proved once again New York’s school districts aren’t having much difficulty staying under—or overriding—the property tax cap. Read More

Where NY’s school money goes

It’s commonly perceived that New York’s education funding system directs more money to wealthier, whiter schools than to poorer, less white schools – and that the distribution of state aid reinforces those inequities. Looking at the totality of school spending across the state, however, different patterns emerge. Read More

One-house megabucks

With the clock ticking toward the April 1 start of the next state fiscal year, Assembly Democrats just laid out their budget preferences—and, as usual, they add up to a massive tax-and-spend fantasy. Read More

Tax cap fibs test limits

Government unions aren’t letting the facts get in the way of their opposition to Governor Andrew Cuomo’s push for a permanent property tax cap. Testifying in Albany this month on Cuomo’s FY20 Executive Budget, union leaders made a number of misrepresentations regarding the cap, which since 2011 has slowed the growth of property taxes outside New York City. Read More

Cuomo holding strong on tax cap

Governor Andrew Cuomo on Friday laid down an important marker in his push to make the property tax cap permanent, rejecting changes that would weaken it. Read More

Assembly GOP wants higher taxes

Assembly Republicans, who ought to know better, have issued a proposal that would weaken the state’s property tax cap. Read More

Teachers union shrinks after Janus

New York’s statewide teachers union is collecting cash from about 6,000 fewer people than it was before the Supreme Court ruling that ended compulsory union fees for public employees. Read More

Subscribe

Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100
Fax: 518-434-3130
E-Mail: info@empirecenter.org

About

The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.