white-flag-150x150-5645925In buckling under to pressure and threats from Governor Andrew Cuomo, National Grid has firmed up a troubling new normal of regulatory policy in New York State.

Cuomo announced yesterday that National Grid had agreed to end its self-imposed moratorium on new downstate natural gas hookups—which the utility had justified on grounds that the state’s opposition to a new gas pipeline would pinch supplies. 

The company will, among other things, pay $36 million in penalties, and submit “a long-term options analysis” exploring how it can meet demand. In return, the state Public Service Commission (PSC) has agreed not to force the company to sell off its assets and cease operations in Queens, Brooklyn and Long Island.

In threatening to pull the utility’s franchise—a power that only the PSC, National Grid’s regulator, ultimately exercises—Cuomo picked a fight in uncharted legal territory. But rather than waiting for PSC action and then taking the matter to court, National Grid effectively surrendered (and agreed to remain silent about last month’s closed-door discussions with the governor’s appointees).

The settlement allows National Grid to count on “additional [gas] capacity to constrained portions” of Long Island from upgrades at four compression stations (two in upstate and two in Connecticut) on the Iroquois pipeline, which it doesn’t own. That smacks of hypocrisy, considering that the PSC and Cuomo came down hard on National Grid for previously relying on a different company’s upgrades (the Northeast Transmission Enhancement) to provide more gas.

Looking beyond the settlement to the PSC’s statutory role to ensure utility reliability, New Yorkers remain in the dark about the underlying questions that precipitated this fight: future supplies of natural gas downstate. Even Cuomo publicly chided the PSC chairman for being caught flat-footed about the “obvious supply issue.” A statewide analysis of gas supply adequacy expected in July was never made public, and Cuomo has shown no indication that he’ll stop blocking gas pipelines.

Cuomo’s tip jar

One of the provisions of National Grid’s settlement with the Cuomo administration is cause for special concern.

Most of the penalty—$20 million—will go toward “clean energy projects and/or investments in New York-based startup energy businesses and technologies to reduce reliance on fossil fuels.”

But the destination isn’t as suspect as the manner in which the money will move.

“Given the potential need for consultation from several agencies,” the settlement reads, “the Division of the Budget [DOB] will be responsible for directing the use of these funds.” [emphasis added]

This means the projects will be handpicked by the governor, to which DOB directly reports.

This is not the first time the Cuomo administration has squeezed regulated companies for funds ultimately controlled by the governor. The administration extracted $2 billion from the proceeds of Centene’s acquisition of healthcare non-profit Fidelis Health Care last year, and forced Aetna and CVS to kick up $40 million as part of getting its merger approved. The merger between Cigna and Express Scripts was also conditioned on a contribution to what the Empire Center’s Bill Hammond described as the administration’s “tip jar”.

Those healthcare funds, which were collected and spent without the Legislature’s approval, were used to fund a Medicaid reimbursement rate increase that appears to be linked to about $1 million in campaign contributions to benefit the governor’s 2018 re-election bid.

National Grid’s decision to back down all but cements the PSC, and its broad powers, as an extension of the governor’s office, and normalizes Cuomo’s practice of wetting his beak in regulatory matters. The utility deprived New Yorkers of an overdue confrontation against executive overreach—putting it in the company of New York’s state lawmakers who have also taken a powder on the matter.

You may also like

One of New York’s Biggest Medicaid Contractors Is Quietly Acquiring a Competitor

Author's note: This post has been updated to correct an error in the second paragraph. As state lawmakers debate the future of Medicaid home care, one of the program's bigg Read More

The Union Gave Them the Wrong Data. The Pols Cited It Anyway.

The episode shows the extent to which New York elected officials fail to question the state’s public employee unions—or look at data themselves. Read More

New York’s Home Health Workforce Jumped by 12 Percent in One Year

New York's home health workforce has continued its pattern of extraordinary growth, increasing by 62,000 jobs or 12 percent in a single year, according to newly released data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.  Read More

While New York’s Medicaid Budget Soared, Public Health Funding Languished

Four years after a devastating pandemic, the state has made no major investment to repair or improve its public health defenses. While funding for Medicaid over the past four years Read More

Unions are pressing bogus arguments for blowing up NY’s public pension debts

New York's public employee unions are arguing, without evidence, that state lawmakers need to retroactively sweeten the pensions of workers who have been on the job for more than a decade. In fact, state and federal data show why state lawmakers shouldn't. Read More

A Medicaid Grant Recipient Sponsors a Pro-Hochul Publicity Campaign

While much of the health-care industry is attacking Governor Hochul's Medicaid budget, at least one organization is rallying to her side: Somos Community Care, a politically active medical group in the Bronx that recently r Read More

New Jersey’s Pandemic Report Shines Harsh Light on a New York Scandal

A recently published independent review of New Jersey's pandemic response holds lessons for New York on at least two levels. First, it marked the only serious attempt by any state t Read More

Senate, Assembly Budget Plans Include $4B Pension Giveaway

A little-noticed provision in lawmakers’ budget proposals would also be the most costly: their proposal to change state retirement rules would slam New York taxpayers with more than $4 billion in new debt, and immediately drive up pension costs, by retroactively sweetening the pension benefits of public employees. Read More