A report declaring “no statistically significant evidence of tax migration in New York” and finding “high earners’ migration rates returned to pre-Covid levels” during 2022 has a glaring problem: It relies heavily on an almost microscopic sample size of self-reported income data.

The Fiscal Policy Institute, a union-aligned research outfit, used figures collected for the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, based on a random sample of households, to argue that recent increases in effective tax rates haven’t caused people to leave the state faster. The ACS is based on about 9,000 interviews per year in New York: Even ignoring doubts about self-reported income, whittling that group down, in multiple years, first to households in the top 1 percent of incomes and then to those that moved in the past year would have left FPI with a sample size of high-income moves that could fit around a picnic table.

Data that more accurately document taxpayer migration—and permit reasonable inferences—are those collected by the IRS and state tax departments. Data about moves that happened between 2021 and 2022—the first since Albany made the top income tax rates paid in New York City the nation’s highest—aren’t expected for months.

The authors of the FPI report say that it “dispels the myth that the rich are moving away in search of lower taxes.” But data from more definitive sources have shown multiple warning signs of taxpayer outmigration.

  • New York’s share of income millionaires has shrunk, even amid pre- and post-COVID booms in the finance sector.
  • Beyond the COVID-driven moves in 2020, the percentage of the state’s highest earners (with incomes above $25 million) moving out of the state was actually higher during 2021 than it was in 2020.
  • The average income of Florida-bound migrants from New York surged to more than $220,000 in 2021—more than double what it had been just a few years prior.

A review of tax data by state Comptroller Tom DiNapoli (hardly a right-winger) shows a continuation of a trend the Empire Center’s E.J. McMahon spotted in 2017 about high-earners appearing to limit their time in New York. DiNapoli’s analysis found almost 57 percent of tax filers with income over $1 million were non-residents—making money in New York but counting some other place as their permanent home.

As with all things migration, incentives matter. The FPI report appears to be the first volley in an effort to pressure Governor Hochul into backing off from her plan to balance the fiscal 2025 state budget without tax increases that would risk further eroding the state’s personal income tax base. Among residents, about 46 percent of the income tax is paid by the top 1 percent of earners.

Gaps between state expenses and receipts opened this year as officials hiked school aid and Medicaid spending to record levels based on optimistic tax projections that have since fallen back to Earth. FPI argued that Hochul should close the gaps with “targeted tax increases” with a focus on “increasing the overall progressivity” of the tax system.

New York risks making taxpayers leave faster by increasing their cost of living here. The state’s spending problem, on the other hand, isn’t going away any time soon.

You may also like

Hochul Shows a Jarring Lack of Direction on Health Care

Financing and regulating health care delivery is one of the biggest responsibilities of state government, yet Governor Hochul had remarkably little to say on that topic in her State of the State speech on Tuesday. Read More

Hochul’s Pushing Affordability. It Would Cost A Lot.

Governor Hochul is hammering an “affordability” theme in the leadup to Tuesday's 2025 State of the State address. But her campaign, dubbed "Money In Your Pockets," has so far featured little that would reduce the cost of providing, and therefore buying, goods or services in New York. Instead, the biggest announced and expected elements reflect Albany's waning interest in growing the state economy—and a greater appetite to redistribute what it produces. Read More

Unions Reprogram NYS To Do Less With More

Governor Hochul on Saturday signed an innocuous-sounding bill to “regulate the use of automated decision-making systems and artificial intelligence techniques by state agencies.” But the “Legislative Oversight of Automated Decision-making in Government,” or LOADinG Act, wasn’t about protecting New York from self-aware computers trying to wipe out humanity. Instead, it was an early Christmas present for the state's public employee unions—and a lump of coal for New Yorkers hoping for more efficient state government. Read More

Former Utility Regulator Warns State Lawmakers They’re On the Naughty List

A legislative hearing into spending by the state’s sprawling energy agency featured a surprise guest who offered sober warnings about Albany’s energy policy. Read More

New York’s Public Employee Shortage Is Over

Public employee unions complained loudly when New York's state government workforce shrank during the coronavirus pandemic, using that decrease as pretext to press Governor Hochul and state lawmakers for more hiring and costly giveaways to benefit their members. But the latest data show nearly every state agency has more employees than it did a year ago, and that by at least one key measure, the state workforce is larger than it was before COVID. Read More

Upstate Insurance Customers Pay the Price for Medicare’s Hospital Rate Hike

A billion-dollar Medicare windfall for upstate hospitals has turned into a crisis for upstate health insurers that's threatening to disrupt coverage for millions of New Yorkers. The Read More

Hochul Wants To Spend The Same Billions Twice

Governor Hochul’s plan to mail $500 checks to millions of households has a problem: the sales tax “surplus” she wants to dish out doesn't exist. Read More

How Will A Major Milk Plant Fit Under NY’s Climate Limits? It Won’t.

Plans to build a milk-processing facility in Monroe County were announced last year to great fanfare but with few details on how such an energy-intensive operation could fit within Albany’s strict climate rules poised to hit homes and businesses. The answer: it won’t have to. Read More