New York’s new “stable option” pension gimmick for local governments and school districts is “a stopgap with long-term risks,” Moody’s Investor Service warned this week.

The pension funding changes, approved as part of the 2013-14 state budget as alternatives to an even more questionable proposal by Governor Andrew Cuomo, were the focus of a two-page analysis in Moody’s latest biweekly Credit Outlook report (subscription-only).

“The deferral of pension contributions would increase the unfunded pension liabilities of participating local governments, a credit negative,” Moody’s said [emphasis added].

The new state budget provisions give localities and school districts the ability to avoid coming increases in pension costs by pushing a portion of these increases into the future. For workers in the New York State Employee Retirement System (ERS) and Police and Fire Retirement System (PFRS), Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli agreed to modify his existing “amortization” plan in a way that will allow employers to defer even more of their required contributions —which means they will owe even more and will be more vulnerable to financial risks in the longer term.

The New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) will offer school districts a different optional plan that will hold the contribution levels to between 14 and 18 percent over the next seven year, with the requirement that any deferred amounts be fully repaid within 12 years. The NYSTRS approach, like DiNapoli’s, requires repayment with added interest pegged to the currently low Treasury bill rate. At a special meeting this morning, the NYSTRS board voted unanimously to approve the option (not a surprise, since TRS staff negotiated the changes with Cuomo’s office and Legislature).

Moody’s take:

The positive short-term budgetary relief will outweigh the cost of increasing unfunded pension liabilities for only the most financially stressed local governments. Cash-strapped localities such as Nassau County (A2 stable), Rockland County (Baa3 negative) and the City of Glen Cove (Baa3 negative) may benefit from this tradeoff given their significantly strained cash positions.

This point bears repeating: the deferral option may be worth it only for localities so “strapped” that they have no other ready source of cash to pay their bills in the short term.  But even these sick puppies will be adding to and compounding their existing unfunded pension liabilities, not to mention other debts and unfunded liabilities for retiree health insurance.

On the other hand, local governments and school districts not on the brink of insolvency really need to think twice about this. Moody’s again:

For example, a local government with $100 million in ERS salaries would have to pay $20.9 million in pension contributions for 2014. If the local government opts into the plan, it will gain $8.9 million in budgetary relief, but also create an unfunded liability of the same amount. This unfunded liability will grow in each successive year that the local government is part of the new deferral program, which will have to be met with future contributions.

Participating local governments exacerbate their risks if investment returns are below projections …

A similar point was made at this morning’s NYSTRS board meeting by Nicholas Smirensky, a former senior investment officer for ERS and PFRS who is the comptroller’s appointee to the NYSTRS board.  ”There are some risks associated with this,” Smirensky said, citing the Moody’s analysis.

About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

DiNapoli bolsters pension fund stability—and cuts tax-funded costs

DiNapoli announced today that he's approved a recommendation by the State Retirement System Actuary to reduce, from 6.8 percent to 5.9 percent, the assumed rate of return (RoR) on investments by the $268 billion Common Retirement Fund, which underwrites the New York State and Local Employee Retirement System (NYSLERS) and Police and Fire Retirement System (PFRS), of which the comptroller is the sole trustee. Read More

The Gov’s pension

There are several (dozens? hundreds?) of unanswered questions as the fallout from Andrew Cuomo's resignation earlier today continues. Among those are questions related to his pension, some of which can be answered, sort of. Read More

NYSTRS bill to drop again

The New York State Teachers' Retirement System (NYSTRS) will reduce its pension contribution rates for a third consecutive year in 2017-18, even though the pension fund's investment returns came in well below its target rate in fiscal 2016. Read More

The new (old) normal of NY pensions

The Empire State's largest public pension plan still has not fully recovered from the financial crisis and Great Recession of 2008-09, a new report from the state comptroller's office confirms. Read More

DiNapoli’s “slight gains” in context

New York's largest public pension fund earned 2 percent in its first fiscal quarter—which isn't necessarily good or bad news for taxpayers. Read More

NYC pension costs shooting up

Taxpayer-funded pension contributions in New York City will need to increase by a total of $732 million between fiscal years 2018 and 2020 due to the pension funds' paltry investment earnings in the recently concluded 2016 fiscal year, City Comptroller Scott Stringer has just disclosed. Read More

Skelos pension could exceed $95k

Following his conviction on federal corruption charges, former Senator Dean Skelos apparently will qualify for a public pension of up to $95,590 a year. Read More

A losing quarter for NYS pensions

Still betting far too heavily on the stock market, New York State's main state and local government pension fund lost money in the first half of its current fiscal year. Read More